|
knightablaze (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Because the camera here is not in "night." This is the dayside of the moon. Tell me, can you see the stars during the day (not during a total eclipse)?
2facedsomebits (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Can anyone tell me why I can see stars from earth on any cloudless night, and a HD camera in space can not?
alienmoonbase (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So, where are the sub 30 meter resolution images?
How about JAXA takes about 50 images of the areas of interest at 30? meter resolution and post them on the web and we will process them using registax.
Is that so hard?
Four months and no usable images. I saw the bad astronomy guy speak and he said they like to keep them for a year. When a year comes and goes what question should I be asking without being lumped in with the apollo conspiracy people? How about "Please tell the truth
alienmoonbase (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I meant the CIA. The OSS is its antecedent. The founder was a former OSS agent
Read Terry Hansen's book "Missing Times" very well researched and documented
alienmoonbase (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
We are in a state of total dependency when it comes to images from the back side of the moon.
There is an implied total and absolute trust of government interwoven in the logic of the skeptics.
Intelligence services don't lie!
The OSS would NEVER use tax money and a former psychological warfare office to start, say the National Inquirer.
Of course the Inquirer has been the main force in successfullly marginalizing the ET subject.
Trust, is why we need laws making this illegal
alienmoonbase (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The question of alien artifacts on the moon is valid. It is totally unrelated to the crazies who think we didn't land on the moon. Even Seth Shostack said we haven't really looked.
Also worth noting is that just because an image is HD doesn't mean its very useful for this search. Clementine images, 1 pixel = 1000', this is not useful. see mro
Jaxa hasn't been much better. I find it interesting that 3 japanese exec officials recently came out believing that some ufos are extra terrestrial.
HotGirlcqy77 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hi I'm 21 woman hot hit my url to see
standauffish (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Sad you really don't have a clue... So what about the sunrise and sunset rays on the Moon? Next you will try to tell me there are no dust storms on the Moon to account for those huh?
standauffish (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You forgot to add the part that it is an exact match for a picture from google earth...but then you wouldn't know that being on the 'outside'
You also forgot to mention "Such an addition could have been Photoshopped in, " that Fox says or that the Chinese claim an extra crater as proof but it was an overlap error
So you a NASA stooge?
hyperkinetic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Right, and even the Hubble suffers from the *same* problem this camera does. If the sunlit moon were in the field of view of the Hubble, with the same aperture used to image stars, the moon would washout *every* star normally visible, *and* the moon would be over exposed, losing all detail. |